<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USC jumps to #2 in BCS, leapfrogs Michigan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dfnsports.com/bigten/2006/11/27/usc-jumps-to-2-in-bcs-leapfrogs-michigan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dfnsports.com/bigten/2006/11/27/usc-jumps-to-2-in-bcs-leapfrogs-michigan/</link>
	<description>Big Ten sports blog covering Big Ten football &#038; basketball provided by the staff at BigTen-fans.com</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Trojan101</title>
		<link>http://www.dfnsports.com/bigten/2006/11/27/usc-jumps-to-2-in-bcs-leapfrogs-michigan/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Trojan101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 03:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dfnsports.com/bigten/2006/11/27/usc-jumps-to-2-in-bcs-leapfrogs-michigan/#comment-26</guid>
		<description>I guess we know why they were ranked above Michigan, and It didnt hurt that you lost in the last week of the season to a team that didnt deserve a national championship bid.  Just think, if they had left you at number 2, a Big Ten team would have won a national championship, when they were actually incapable of even winning a BCS game.  Where would that have left the vastly superior Florida and Southern Cal teams?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess we know why they were ranked above Michigan, and It didnt hurt that you lost in the last week of the season to a team that didnt deserve a national championship bid.  Just think, if they had left you at number 2, a Big Ten team would have won a national championship, when they were actually incapable of even winning a BCS game.  Where would that have left the vastly superior Florida and Southern Cal teams?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
