Does Missouri have a gripe?
Wednesday, December 5th, 2007Now Missouri knows how Kansas St. must have felt in 1998 and 1999.
The Tigers were ranked #1 in the BCS heading into the Big 12 title game against Oklahoma, but fell 38-17, and went from potentially having a shot at playing for a national championship to the Cotton Bowl.
It’s the same thing that happened to Kansas St. in 1998, when the Wildcats were #1 heading into the Big 12 title game. After their classic 36-33 double-OT loss to Texas A&M, K-State only fell to third in the BCS, but instead of getting a BCS berth, went to the Alamo Bowl, which they lost to Purdue. The next year, the Wildcats finished sixth, with a loss to Nebraska the only blemish in a 10-1 regular season, but went to the Holiday Bowl. So, in case anyone’s wondering about Nebraska and Oklahoma getting into the national title game through the back door, maybe it was just karma making up for Kansas St.’s misfortunes.
Fast forward back to 2007, where another Big 12 North team is hurtin’. While the Tigers got the short end of the BCS stick, two teams that they beat in the regular season, Illinois and Kansas, both received invites to BCS bowls. Both of those teams were also ranked lower than Missouri in the BCS - the Tigers were sixth in the final BCS standings, while Kansas was 8th, and Illinois was 13th.
The Kansas snub might have been the most painful to take, not only because the two are bitter rivals, but also because Missouri had beaten Kansas just a week earlier to win the Big 12 North title.
But, the same could be said for Illinois getting a BCS berth as well (Arizona St. could have a gripe too, being 10-2 and two spots ahead of Illinois in the BCS standings), because the Tigers beat the Illini in the season opener, one of Illinois’ three losses.
But, given the fact that OU received the automatic berth, and Kansas received the at-large berth, that left Missouri as the odd man out, due to the rule against having more than two teams from the same conference in BCS bowls.
Unfortunately, as deserving as Missouri may be, they picked the worst time to lose. Things don’t usually bode well for your fortunes if you go down in a conference championship game, but if you lose the week before, it might not be so bad, as Kansas and the 2001 Nebraska team can attest to.
Should there be a change in the BCS rules, that allows three teams from a particular conference to be in BCS bowls? In some years, that wouldn’t be a bad idea, especially when the conference in question is tremendously strong.
There still might end up being some situations where the individual bowl committees might pick the team they want for their matchup, and not necessarily the team that may be most deserving.
This isn’t to say that Illinois isn’t deserving - the Illini beat #1 Ohio St. on the road and also beat #5 Wisconsin and #21 Penn St. And, because they fit the necessary criteria, they made the perfect candidate to give the Rose Bowl its desired Pac-10 vs. Big Ten matchup.
And as for Kansas, they likely would have been in the same position as Missouri had they beaten the Tigers then lost to Oklahoma - the only better situation for Missouri than to have won the Big 12 title game was to have lost to Kansas, because the loser of that game was going to be in a better position than the winner, if things shook out as they wound up doing.
But, in the end, if you want to assure your place in the elitest of the elite New Year’s and post-New Year’s games, you’ve got to take care of business week in, week out - or at least avoid the ill-timed loss.